Abstract:
The complexity, precision and size of the Great Pyramid are contrasted
to the simplicity of pharaohs’ tombs. It is proposed that it is a
plutonium mill. Its perfection of construction and choice of materials
are compared against all other pyramids. The current history of
plutonium production is related. The internal geometry of the pyramid is
given correspondence to the process steps of breeding plutonium,
separating plutonium from other material, disposing of radioactive
waste, using water and producing hydroelectric power. The practical
value of plutonium and the economic justification of the pyramid are
discussed. Later attempts by the Egyptians to recreate the power and
value of the pyramid are analyzed. Scientific methods for testing
whether or not nuclear fission occurred within the pyramid are defined.
Introduction
The Great Pyramid at Giza has remained a complete mystery in modern
times. When was it built? Who built it? Above all else, what is it?
Conventional Egyptology declares that all pyramids were tombs for the
pharaohs.
The sophistication, required technology and cost of the Great Pyramid
conflict with the thought that it is simply a tomb. This level of effort
for a burial place stretches common sense to the breaking point.
To quote Alan Alford (The Phoenix Solution) “Is it so crazy to
suggest that the unique design of the Great Pyramid was a legacy from an
earlier, more advanced culture? In my view, it is certainly much less
crazy than continuing to believe that the Pyramid was constructed as a
tomb for a dead king, and that he built this totally over-engineered and
revolutionary wonder of the world with absolute perfection at the first
attempt.”
