In the article, you will find links to the sources I used. What I
found out is that current international Civil law and thus *all* the
nations operating under this jurisdiction (including the *corporate* US
government) ultimately are legally nothing but vassals of the Vatican.
In other words: (virtually) *all* nations are run as (de-facto)
corporations under the jurisdiction of the Vatican. And that gives some
very interesting possibilities:
Another part of this story, is the process talked about by a fellow named Drake. He talks about returning the US to common law before Law Enforcement agencies in the US will perform mass arrests of the bankers in the US. In this process, juries are formed (an important feature of common law) in various states, which file some paperwork by which the states declare their independence of the corporate Washington government and return to their original constitution and bill of rights.
Another part of this story, is the process talked about by a fellow named Drake. He talks about returning the US to common law before Law Enforcement agencies in the US will perform mass arrests of the bankers in the US. In this process, juries are formed (an important feature of common law) in various states, which file some paperwork by which the states declare their independence of the corporate Washington government and return to their original constitution and bill of rights.
Because of the intriguing nature of this process, I started studying
the history of our own constitution and found out that the 1789
constitution of the Batavian Republic is the only Dutch constitution
that has been lawfully ratified by the people under common law.
All later ones, including the 1801 version under Napoleon, were either illegal or not ratified under the authority of the people but under the authority of someone else.
Interestingly, the constitution OF the Batavian Republic (and the 1801 one) were the only constitutions OF The Netherlands. ALL the later constitutions are constitutions FOR The Netherlands and thus OF someone else….
All later ones, including the 1801 version under Napoleon, were either illegal or not ratified under the authority of the people but under the authority of someone else.
Interestingly, the constitution OF the Batavian Republic (and the 1801 one) were the only constitutions OF The Netherlands. ALL the later constitutions are constitutions FOR The Netherlands and thus OF someone else….
Further investigations revealed that the authority under which the
current Kingdom of The Netherlands legally operates up until today is
none less than the Vatican, which gives us some very interesting
possibilities to liberate the people of this planet from literally ages
of (financial) tyranny under jurisdiction, authority, sovereignty and
responsibility of the Vatican.
One of the most revealing clues on how to do this can be found in the treaty of Paris of 1815:
The Allied Powers having by their united efforts, and by the success
of their arms, preserved France and Europe from the convulsions with
which they were menaced by the late enterprise of Napoleon Bonaparte,
and by the Revolutionary system reproduced in France, to promote its
success;
What this says is basically that the French and thus Dutch and United
States revolutions are a direct and severe threat to the Vatican’s
objectives and therefore a blessing to all freedom loving people on this
planet, even though the whole French revolution may (initially) have
been a kind of false flag operation along the lines set out by Prof.
Veith. Either way, here is why these revolutions actually ARE a deadly
weapon against the dark Cabal:
The essential trick for a nation to liberate itself, is to declare a
bill of rights and a republican constitution by referendum under common
law and under the authority of the people themselves, after the example
that has been set in the late 1700s by all three mentioned republics.
As far as I am aware, the US did not use a referendum, but the Dutch Batavian Republic definitely did. It may be possible to use some other process, but with a constitution ratified by the people of a nation by referendum there is no question about the legal validity nor authority of said constitution.
In other words: NO ONE can legally prevent the people of a nation to declare their independence under common law.
As far as I am aware, the US did not use a referendum, but the Dutch Batavian Republic definitely did. It may be possible to use some other process, but with a constitution ratified by the people of a nation by referendum there is no question about the legal validity nor authority of said constitution.
In other words: NO ONE can legally prevent the people of a nation to declare their independence under common law.
What this does is that it establishes a new legal entity, a free and
really independent Republic, under the jurisdiction of Common Law
instead of under the jurisdiction of international civil law, which up
to this day still operates under authority and sovereignty of the
Vatican.
In other words: you now have two DIFFERENT legal entities governing over one and the same country, of which only one is really free and independent and operates under the authority of the People now actually OWNING their land instead of legally STILL being a vassal of the Vatican.
The latter STILL being the case for at least all previous colonies of the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands and Spain as well as ALL of Europe and Russia.
In other words: you now have two DIFFERENT legal entities governing over one and the same country, of which only one is really free and independent and operates under the authority of the People now actually OWNING their land instead of legally STILL being a vassal of the Vatican.
The latter STILL being the case for at least all previous colonies of the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands and Spain as well as ALL of Europe and Russia.
The other side of this is that the legal entity that still exists as a
vassal of the Vatican no longer has any subjects nor any possessions
within the now liberated country, BUT it is still burdened with ALL of
its obligations and liabilities established under the authority and
responsibility of the Vatican. So, these are NOT the problem of the now
liberated people, which were after all just subjects ruled under the
sovereignty of the Vatican.
In other words: we now have not only a nice trick to liberate a
nation, but also a convenient way to get rid of the problem of nation’s
debt, which is now the problem of the Vatican and not of the nation’s
self-liberated people.
How nice!
What’s even more interesting, is that this process could in principle
also be done at a global level by the UN. If the general assembly would
make a statement in which they declare the whole planet to be free and
independent under Common Law by declaring a bill of rights and a global
constitution after the example set by the US and the Dutch Batavian
Republic, then all people would be free from suppression by the Dark
Cabal.
And the burden of ALL global debts established under the authority and responsibility of the Vatican would no longer be the problem of the people of this planet.
And the burden of ALL global debts established under the authority and responsibility of the Vatican would no longer be the problem of the people of this planet.
Now THAT would be something I would love to see. :)
~~~~~~~
It turns out that Benjamin Fulford and his fellowship is aware of this principle, too:
~~~~~~~
It turns out that Benjamin Fulford and his fellowship is aware of this principle, too:
Yes, we are aware of this. If the US removes the P2 fascist
government run via the United States of America corporation, then all US
external debts will not have to be paid by the American people. We are
trying to bankrupt that war mongering and murdering corporation and
their fascist overseers at the P2 Roman empire headquarters. This in no
way implies we are opposed to the beliefs held by the majority of
Catholics.
Benjamin Fulford古歩道ベンジャミン
Please spread the word!
Namaste!
Arend Lammertink, MSc.
Goor, The Netherlands.
Arend Lammertink, MSc.
Goor, The Netherlands.
No comments:
Post a Comment